ROI Calculator
Run the numbers — how much can smart welding save you each year?
Every dollar saved drops straight to net profit.
Most welding calculators price a single weld. Suxin rolls gas, labor, downtime, documentation and rework into one annual ledger — count only what's yours, and see exactly how much you save each year.
The Chinese site uses CNY, the English site EUR; the two markets use different prices and do not convert (switching language switches market).
① Gas — immediate cash savings
Safe, automatic, intelligent gas control — significantly cuts the bulk of gas waste
€0
/yr
0
Gas volume Nm³/yr (incl. waste)
process need 0 + waste 0 Nm³
€0
Gas spend/yr
€0
Wasted (~25% est.)
€0
Total saved/yr
Note: ~25% typical waste; ~80% recovered → ~20% net saving. The remaining ~5% is identified-but-not-yet-recovered headroom, conservatively excluded.
Where it goes — typical waste sources
- Metering bias (inaccurate float reading + manual setting)8%
- Fixed-flow / mismatch8%
- Start-up overshoot4%
- Post-weld spillover3%
- Supply & use leakage2%
Why? Mechanical valves can't measure or control
Grey = mechanical valve: startup overshoot, flow drift, post-weld spillover, leakage unnoticed (shaded = waste); Blue = Suxin closed-loop: a smart algorithm that cuts overshoot, spillover and leakage and adapts to the process accurately and automatically.
Advanced (flow · workdays · waste rate · gas-price mix · cylinder spec)
Gas price (material cost ÷ material share · partner deck)
All gas volumes are in Nm³ (standard conditions: 0°C, 101.325 kPa); the cylinder "volume × pressure" conversion is an ideal-gas approximation, excluding temperature & compressibility.
0
shielding gas saved Nm³/yr
0
≈ direct CO₂ cut /yr
—
≈ equivalent (illustrative)
How is this computed?
① Price → per-Nm³: cylinder = price-per-cylinder ÷ volume (L × MPa ÷ 100, e.g. 40L×15MPa ≈ 6 Nm³, ideal-gas approximation, excl. temperature & compressibility); bulk = price-per-ton ÷ 1000 × gas density (Ar 1.78 / mix 1.82 / CO₂ 1.98 kg/Nm³). Bulk mixed-gas €/t = Ar €/t × Ar-share + CO₂ €/t × CO₂-share (default 80:20 → €1300/t, see Advanced). Nm³ = standard conditions (0°C, 101.325 kPa).
② Effective (ideal) gas = units × empirical flow × 60 × arc-h/day × workdays ÷ 1000; real gas = effective ÷ (1 − waste rate) (overshoot/spillover/drift/leakage consume gas on top of effective use); × unit price = annual gas spend.
③ Annual saving = gas spend × waste rate × recovery rate (default 30% × 90% ≈ 27% saved, conservative); groups summed, no double-counting.
④ Done by hardware (precision sensing + closed-loop control) — no AI, no change to operators.
📌 ≥10% saving or you don't pay; CO₂/mixed gas usually 20%+ (expected, not promised).
Digital compliance & traceability
Qualitative value · can't be priced, not counted in the total
0 → 100%
born-digital
Weld records go from paper spot-checks to 100% born-digital and auditable, helping you meet the process and record requirements of these welding-quality traceability standards:
ISO 3834 (welding quality system) — born-digital records + automatic WPS comparison + full-lifecycle traceability
WPS / PQR — live WPS comparison per weld, out-of-range flagged as non-conforming, auto-tabulated
EN 1090 (steel/aluminium CE) — the digital backbone for its ISO 3834 records/traceability
EN 15085 (railway vehicles) — per-weld traceability, one-click audit
* We help companies meet ISO/EN standards — we do not issue a "Suxin certification"; it does not replace destructive testing, welder qualification or third-party certification.
② Labor productivity — extra output
Higher arc-on utilization (+10% conservative, equipment-level, no worker monitoring) → value of extra output from the same headcount
€0
/yr
2 (from groups above)
× 8h/shift × 300d = €0/yr (annual labor cost)
conservative 10% (up to 30%)
How is this computed?
① Value = stations × annual labor cost × utilization uplift % (default 10%, up to 30%); annual cost = hourly × hours/shift × workdays (latter two in Advanced).
② Platform tasking + arc-on utilization tracking + PDCA loop lets the same headcount weld more (+10% capacity) — worth ~10% of the labor capacity.
③ ⭐ Equipment-level arc data only, no worker-level info (GDPR by-design) — raising OEE without monitoring workers.
📌 Strictly separate from ③ Downtime: this = more output in normal run; downtime = fewer fault stoppages. Never double-counted.
③ Downtime — fewer stoppages, more output
Alerts + remote diagnostics cut unplanned stoppage hours (−30% conservative), valued at idle-labor cost
€0
/yr
2 (from groups above)
≈ 100h/yr·station (of 2000h)
× €50/h (see ②)
How is this computed?
① Value = stations × annual hours (hours/shift × workdays, EU 2000h / CN 2400h) × downtime % (default 5%) × downtime cut % (default 30%) × hourly rate; when a machine stops the welder is paid but idle — valued conservatively at labor cost (hourly wages are the real loss in EU/US).
② Multi-sensor monitoring (current/voltage…) + anomaly time-slicing + alerts & remote diagnostics slash the time spent on the real bottleneck — finding the fault.
📌 Strictly separate from ② Productivity & ⑤ Rework: this = fewer fault/long-stop events; ② = more output in normal run; ⑤ = re-welding. Never double-counted.
④ Documentation — no more paperwork
Welders' paper records stay; what's saved is QA staff's "collect→re-key→compile" hours (−90%; legal traceability is a separate qualitative benefit)
€0
/yr
2 (from groups above)
≈ 10min/workday·station (QA staff)
QA clerk ≈ 60% of welder
auto-logging ends re-keying
How is this computed?
① Value = stations × QA-compile h/yr·station (default 50h ≈ 10min/workday·station) × paperwork cut % (default 90%) × doc-staff hourly rate (default €15/h ≈ 60% of welder — a QA clerk is not a scarce role, kept conservatively low).
② It's not the welder's paper that's saved (filling records is mandatory in certified welding, unchanged) but the downstream QA "collect → re-key into spreadsheets → cross-check WPS → assemble dossier" hours — born-digital logging + auto compliance + one-click export/lifelong traceability remove ~90% of that re-keying.
📌 Only paperwork labor is priced; the legal value of traceability is a qualitative benefit, conservatively not monetized. Independent of other dimensions.
⑤ Quality / rework — get it right first time
In-process control + tri-color alerts cut rework (−20% relative); rework = extra welder hours to grind out + re-weld (labor-only, conservative)
€0
/yr
0 h (from groups' arc time)
typical 3–5% in manual welding
clean 0.5× + reweld 1× (original sunk)
× welder €50/h (see ②)
How is this computed?
① Value = annual arc hours × weld rework rate (default 3%) × extra-time × (default 1.5×) × rework-rate cut % (default 20%) × welder hourly rate. Arc hours = Σ groups(units × arc-h/day × workdays), reusing the gas groups above.
② A bad weld = original 1 + grind-out 0.5 + reweld 1 = 2.5× total, i.e. 1.5× more time than a good one; the original is sunk, so only the extra 1.5× (grind+reweld) is counted.
③ Real-time compliance checks + tri-color alerts catch defects as they happen, cutting rework rate ~20% (conservative). Labor only — material, scrap, inspection & schedule losses are excluded, the most conservative basis.
📌 Separate from ② Productivity: ② = more new output via utilization; this = fewer welder hours re-welding. Never double-counted.
Estimated annual quantifiable value (selected dimensions)
€0
Gas saving secures payback; lean delivers the upside
Conservative typical-case estimate; actuals depend on your site. Want a precise on-site model? Talk to us or your local distributor.
Note: Outputs are conservative typical-case averages; dimensions are independent and never double-counted. Not a quote or a profit guarantee. Suxin IoT reserves the final right of interpretation.
Want a tailored model for your plant?
Call or email — we reply the same day.
Calling from outside China? Dial +86-400-012-6886. Prefer email? Write to sales@suxiniot.com.